Subscriber Services
Subscriber Services
Weather
Complete Forecast
News
  •  Breaking News
  •  Gov. Schwarzenegger
  •  Contra Costa County
  •  Alameda County
  •  Bay & State
  •  Crime & Courts
  •  Education
  •  Health
  •  Nation & World
  •  Politics
  •  Science & Environment
  •  Transportation & Growth
  •  Iraq
  •  War on terror
  •  Commuter page
  •  Where we live
  •  Obituaries


Back to Home >  News

Times Editor Chris Lopez's weblog





Tuesday, June 07, 2005

Downing Street memo

I've had two calls today from readers inquiring why we failed to publish a story on a classified government memo in Britain that indicates President Bush wanted to make sure intelligence fit his Iraq policy in 2002. The memo first came to light in the Sunday Times of London and was then reported by Knight Ridder on May 5. Knight Ridder is the corporate owner of the Contra Costa Times. The two readers who called indicated we failed to publish the story because we want to protect President Bush. I have not talked to our national wire desk on their thinking when they saw the story produced by Knight Ridder. Here is the Knight Ridder story that was produced on May 5:

What’s new: A classified government memo in Britain indicates President Bush wanted to make sure intelligence fit his Iraq policy in 2002.
<
By Warren P. Strobel and John Walcott
Knight Ridder Newspapers

WASHINGTON _ A highly classified British memo, leaked in the midst of Britain’s just-concluded election campaign, indicates that President Bush decided to overthrow Iraqi President Saddam Hussein by summer 2002 and was determined to ensure that U.S. intelligence data supported his policy.

The document, which summarizes a July 23, 2002, meeting of British Prime Minister Tony Blair with his top security advisers, reports on a visit to Washington by the head of Britain’s MI-6 intelligence service. The visit took place while the Bush administration was still declaring to the American public that no decision had been made to go to war.

“There was a perceptible shift in attitude. Military action was now seen as inevitable,” the MI-6 chief said at the meeting, according to the memo. “Bush wanted to remove Saddam through military action, justified by the conjunction of terrorism and WMD,” weapons of mass destruction.
The memo said that “the intelligence and facts were being fixed around the policy.”

No weapons of mass destruction have been found in Iraq since the U.S. invasion in March 2003.

The White House has repeatedly denied accusations, made by several top foreign officials, that it manipulated intelligence estimates to justify an invasion of Iraq.

It has instead pointed to the conclusions of two studies, one by the Senate Intelligence Committee and one by a presidentially appointed panel, that cite serious failures by the CIA and other agencies in judging Saddam’s weapons programs.

The principal U.S. intelligence analysis, called a National Intelligence Estimate, wasn’t completed until October 2002, well after the United States and United Kingdom had apparently decided military force should be used to overthrow Saddam’s regime.

The newly disclosed memo, which was first reported by the Sunday Times of London, hasn’t been disavowed by the British government. A spokesman for the British Embassy in Washington referred queries to another official, who didn’t return calls for comment on Thursday.

A former senior U.S. official called it “an absolutely accurate description of what transpired” during the senior British intelligence officer’s visit to Washington. He spoke on condition of anonymity.

A White House official said the administration wouldn’t comment on leaked British documents.

In July 2002, and well afterward, top Bush administration foreign policy advisers were insisting that “there are no plans to attack Iraq on the president’s desk.”

But the memo quotes British Foreign Secretary Jack Straw, a close colleague of then-Secretary of State Colin Powell, as saying that “Bush had made up his mind to take military action.”

Straw is quoted as having his doubts about the Iraqi threat.
“But the case was thin. Saddam was not threatening his neighbors, and his WMD capability was less than that of Libya, North Korea or Iran,” the memo reported he said.
Straw reportedly proposed that Saddam be given an ultimatum to readmit United Nations weapons inspectors, which could help justify the eventual use of force.
Powell in August 2002 persuaded Bush to make the case against Saddam at the United Nations and to push for renewed weapons inspections.
But there were deep divisions within the White House over that course of action. The British document says that the National Security Council, then led by Condoleezza Rice, “had no patience with the U.N. route.”
Rep. John Conyers, D-Mich., the leading Democrat on the House Judiciary Committee, is circulating a letter among fellow Democrats asking Bush for an explanation of the document’s charges, an aide said.

4 Comments:

Blogger neonormal said...

This is pretty thin. I think it needs looking into, but with a cautious eye.

You are right to see how genuine this is lest you start reporting sources like Dan Rather, Jason Blaire et al.

Also keep in mind that all well-prepared Armies have contingcy plans for invading many potentially hostile contries.

The fact that there are plans to invade places like Iran, North Korea, Libya and Iraq should not surprise anyone.

Imagine the outcry if North Korea launces weapons and we have no plan to stop them. The armchair-general, Bush-haters would have a field day decrying how horrible Bush is as a commnader-in-chief.

You are wise to see how this memo plays out.

I wonder if Little Green Footballs have had it yet.

1:21 PM  
Blogger Johnjon said...

Wow, I really like this one. I have a website that talks mostly about post free classified ads You should check it out sometime.

10:26 PM  
Blogger Interad said...

Hello, I am a korean visitor, good to see you.
I am sure that your blog page looks great to me which mean looking crowded so, I would like to let everybodies know korea information official site korea.net same as Dynamic korea - contains all about korea news and informations, please let me introducel this cool site. Dynamic korea offer korea travel, culture, food, arts and government info exactly what you want to knowkorean adoption. You better check it out some time.

1:09 AM  
Blogger Interad said...

Hello, I am a korean visitor, good to see you.
I am sure that your blog page looks great to me which mean looking crowded so, I would like to let everybodies know korea information official site korea.net same as Dynamic korea - contains all about korea news and informations, please let me introducel this cool site. Dynamic korea offer korea travel, culture, food, arts and government info exactly what you want to knowkorea travel. You better check it out some time.

1:17 PM  

Post a Comment

<< Home